11/06/2012 - 10:15 p.m. (updated 11/07/2012)
Municipal Election Results | Federal, State Election Results (Cape Elizabeth only)
Cape Elizabeth voters rejected a bond of up to $6 million for construction of a new Thomas Memorial Library on Nov. 6, 2012. The vote was 2,696 for and 3,566 against.
In a related question, voters also overwhelmingly approved a charter change that would require large single capital expenditures to be approved by citizen vote. The charter change was approved 4,157 to 1,372.
In the remainder of the municipal election, voters re-elected School Board incumbents John Christie, David Hillman and Mary K. Williams-Hewitt. Town Council incumbents Jim Walsh and Jessica Sullivan also won re-election, as did unopposed challenger Jamie Wagner.
On the federal and state ballots, Cape Elizabeth voters favored former Gov. Angus King for U.S. Senate, and voiced a clear preference for President Barack Obama's re-election. Cape Elizabeth voters also overwhelmingly favored the state referendum question for same-sex marriage.
The only state ballot question resolved by Cape Elizabeth voters was their choice for State Representative from District 121 - Kim Monaghan-Derrig was re-elected by a vote of 3,033 to 2,329 over Republican Challenger Nancy Thompson.
In the race for state Senate District 7, which includes Cape Elizabeth, South Portland and Scarborough, Cape voters favored Cape resident Rebecca Millett over South Portland's Mike Wallace. Cape voters also favored Cape Independent Roger Bishop over South Portland candidates Scott Hamann and Kenneth Myrick in the race for State House representative from District 123, which includes South Portland and part of Cape Elizabeth.
Results are unofficial as of Nov. 6.
Town Clerk Debra Lane estimated an approximate voter turnout of 80 percent. More than 2,700 ballots were cast as absentee, and an additional 3,600 voters were served at the polls on Election Day, she said. There were also 277 new registrations.
Maine House of Representatives, District 123
Question 1: Citizen Initiative
YES ............ 4557
NO ............. 1727
Question 2: Bond Issue
Question 3: Bond Issue
YES ............ 4376
NO ............. 1759
Question 4: Bond Issue
Question 5: Bond Issue
YES ............ 4676
NO ............. 1433
TOWN COUNCIL
For three year term until December 14, 2015
Vote for up to THREE (3)
SULLIVAN, JESSICA L. ........................4,061
WAGNER, JAMES R. ............................. 3,814
WALSH, JAMES T. ................................ 3,842
SCHOOL BOARD
For three year term until December 14, 2015
Vote for up to THREE (3)
CHRISTIE, III JOHN C. ......................... 2,629
GOULDING, MICHAEL G. ...................... 1,477
GROSS, III WILLIAM H. ....................... 1,753
HILLMAN, DAVID C. .............................. 2,245
WILLIAMS-HEWITT, MARY K. .............. 3,236
Citizen Vote on Proposed Library Project
Shall the Town of Cape Elizabeth borrow up to $6.0 million to fund a new Thomas Memorial Library and accept private donations to assist with the project?
YES ...... 2,696
NO ........ 3,566
Proposed Charter Amendment
Shall the proposed charter amendment to the Council-Manager Charter of the Town of Cape Elizabeth, a copy of which is printed herein, be adopted?
YES........... 4,157
NO ........... 1,372
ARTICLE
VIII
Initiative
and Referendum
Sec. 1. Petition for
overrule of ordinance. action
of council. All
ordinances, except emergency ordinances passed pursuant to Article
II, Section 12, or any vote for a single capital expenditure or a single
capital improvement, the total cost of which exceeds 0.05 percent of the last
state valuation, shall be subject to overrule by a referendum. as
hereinafter provided; except the following shall not be subject to referendum:
1. If, within 20 days after
the enactment of any such ordinances or passage of any such vote, a
petition signed by not less than 10% of the registered voters of the Town of
Cape Elizabeth is filed with the town clerk requesting its reference to a
referendum, the council shall call a public hearing to be held within 30 days
from the date of the filing of such petition with the town clerk and shall,
within 14 days after said public hearing, designate a time and place for the purpose
of submitting to a referendum vote the question of adopting such ordinance. or approving such vote. Pending action by referendum, the referred
ordinance or vote shall be suspended from going into operation until it
has received an affirmative vote of the majority of the voters voting on said
question.
1. The annual budget; provided, however, if a
single capital expenditure or a single capital improvement, the total cost of
which exceeds 0.05 percent of the last state valuation, is included in the annual
budget, then that part of the annual budget shall be subject to referendum;
Sec. 2. Referendum for approval of certain capital
expenditures. Any vote by the council
for a single capital expenditure of town funds or a single capital improvement
not arising from a fire or other casualty loss, nor arising from a federal or
state mandate, the total cost of which exceeds One Million Dollars
($1,000,000), whether as a separate vote or included in the approved annual
budget, shall be submitted to a referendum vote at a time designated by the
council. Pending action by referendum,
the referred vote, or budget item, shall be suspended from going into operation
until it has received an affirmative vote of the majority of voters voting on
said question. This section shall not
apply to the refinancing of previously authorized debt.
(The
sections which follow will be renumbered as needed.)
Explanation
The intent of this proposal is to require most
single capital expenditures exceeding $1.0 million in value to be approved by
the voters. The current provision is
that a binding citizen vote occurs only after the town clerk receives a
petition signed by 10% of the registered voters asking for a council approved
capital expenditure valued at more than 0.05% of the state valuation to be
overridden. Currently, approximately 750
signatures of voters are needed to attempt to override an expenditure exceeding
$855,375 in value.